Category Archives: Writing

Forget the Damned Box, Inside or Out

Words get used, then overused, then diluted, and then, finally, emptied of all meaning.

When I was coming up in the personal computer software industry, oh so many years ago, some software person came up with the phrase "User Friendly" to describe a software product. Suddenly, or so it seemed, every single software product was declared, by its producers, marketers, and sales people, to be "user friendly."

And those words ended up being a joke. Stripped of all meaning.

These days it’s "outside the box." Everybody, without exception, everybody is now thinking outside the box. That one, people, is done now. Stop using it. Whatever or wherever that box is, there’s nobody left inside it.

Cloud Tag Art … or Analysis?

Wow. Check out the Wordle view of the convention speeches, as posted by Wired. Wordle is an interesting application, sort of like a tag cloud with colors. Or a speech analysis. For example, the following comparison of convention speeches. First, Joe Biden: Joe Biden's Speech
Then, by comparison, Sarah Palin: Sarah Palin's Speech
And from there we go to John McCain’s Speech:

And, finally, Barack Obama’s:

Conclusions? No, probably not … but definitely a very interesting way to look at it. They’ve also posted some others, including candidate’s wives, Hillary Clinton, and George Bush. That’s at Wired

Eloquent Silence. Stunning Pictures, Few Words.

Two of the three winners of SlideShare.net’s 2008 World’s Best Presentation contest are deeply disturbing.

This one, which took first place …

And this one, in third place:

Click and watch. It’s striking how much can be said with no voice and without a lot of words. Most SlideShare presentations suffer the lack of voice, making the site useful as a repository, and assume that voice will come via telephone. These stand alone very well.

And here’s the other one, the second place finisher, which is just fun …

And a tip of the hat to Guy Kawasaki, one of the judges, who announced the winners yesterday on his blog How to Change the World.

Late for the Trash

I just logged into my iStockphoto.com account and found this picture as picture of the year on the main page. Title is "Late for the Trash," and the photographer  is Trent Bell. I don’t know what presentation I’ll use it for yet, but I couldn’t resist. It’s a really good visual.

I’ve been a happy customer of iStockphoto for two or three years now. They have a great inventory of stock photos, with a very serviceable keyword search, and I can download immediately when I’m working on a presentation. It’s not expensive. This one (it’s smallest size, 447 x 268 pixels, which is fine for blog purposes) cost me one credit, and I can buy 10 credits for $14, or 50 for $65. It used to be 30 credits for $25, so maybe I shouldn’t be posting this. The pictures come in four sizes, from extra small to large, and the large, in this case, would have been 3000 x 1804, which would have been 10 credits.

This is what I do nowadays for presentations. Nobody wants to read bullets anyhow, so I use a photo to highlight, a title, and I pretty much know what I want to say. I hate PowerPoint as a teleprompter.

And, by the way, gulp, I don’t take money to plug sites or products. I pay iStockphoto, for example, they don’t pay me. I was about to publish this post when I realized some people, especially newcomers to this blog, might think I’m just hidden advertising. I’d hate for you to think that. I do recommend books, and occasionally software, and especially books and software I’ve written and helped to develop; but you know which they are. My bias on my own books and software is out there and I hope very open.

I make that addition for newcomers. I think if you’ve been with me for a while you’ve already figured that out.

Twitter and Compact Writing

Just noticed this on Twitter, from John Caddell:

sitting on the porch at the lake house. breezes.

older kid kayaking out on the lake,

younger kid commenting on show he’s watching —

paradise.

Which makes me think that there’s a lot to be said for writing within a 140-character limit. How well do those 140 characters evoke an image. My tweet back to John: "great tweet! Does twitter proud."

Back in the 1970s the business world was abuzz when Procter and Gamble established a one-page maximum for memos. John’s piece above is hardly a business memo, but — who knows? Maybe we should word count on everything.

Spellchecker and politics

I found this interesting. It was in David Pogue’s column last week. He’s the New York Times Technology writer:

Q: David: I’ve noticed this for a year, and have not been able to get Microsoft to change it: Type "Obama" or "obama" in Microsoft Word or Outlook, and the spelling checker recommends "Osama" as the corrected spelling. How could this continue month after month, especially now that Mr. Obama is likely to be the Democratic candidate for president? Hope you can connect with appropriate folks at Microsoft and get this changed.

A: Well, it does seem like a silly glitch. But I’m not sure even I could convince Microsoft to release a new version of Microsoft Office software just to correct a single entry in the spelling dictionary. But if it helps, here you go: How about it, Microsoft?

What’s With This “Over At” Stuff?

Nuances of language. The fine touch here, the slight rephrasing there … that interests me.

For example: the use of the "over at" phrase.

The annoying person on the phone, who had weaseled past our receptionist but was just cold calling selling stocks, identified himself as "John Doe over at XYZ." Not "John Doe of XYZ brokerage." Am I crazy, or is that just another subtle spin on reality?  That change to "over at XYZ" sounds like he’s just across the street, at some close and familiar place, instead of the stiff and formal — but correct — "John Doe of XYZ brokerage."

I don’t mind "over at" the way it gets used in blogs, mentioning Steve King "over at Biz Labs," or "Pam Slim over at Cubicle Nation."

But with the cold caller selling stocks, I notice the nuance. It’s not just random, it’s studied and practiced.

Let’s Change This Grammar Rule

Maybe this is just me, and if you don’t give a damn about grammar, then I apologize, please skip the rest of this post. This is about a grammar rule that should change.

The proper English grammar is to put the period inside the quotation marks at the end of the sentence. But what if the quotation is something to search for, or type, like a password. For example, this sentence:

Your password is "password."

In this case, do you type "password" or do you type "password." before pressing the Enter key? That’s confusing. Grammar is supposed to relieve confusion, not cause more confusion.

Here’s another example:

Just search for "business plan software."

What do I type into the search engine, before I click? Do I type "business plan software" or do I type "business plan software." and there again, the grammar confuses the issue.

The solution is for us to get together with editors and style guides and establish that the quotation marks used to set off the keystrokes counts more than the normal quotation convention. So it should be

Your password is "password".

Search in Google for "business plan software".

And for those of you who couldn’t care less about grammar technicalities, I apologize again. I realize most people couldn’t care less. But some of us do care, and in my case I’m going over edits for my latest book, and this comes up more than once.

George Carlin’s Last Interview

I always liked George Carlin, even if not every routine he ever had. I liked his off-kilter anti-establishment viewpoint. I think the world, and especially our world in the United States, needs dissenters. And it needs good writers. So I’m very sorry to see him go.

Brian Clark at Copyblogger posted George Carlin on Writing, with a couple of good quotes from the much longer post George Carlin’s Last Interview on Psychology Today Blogs. Here’s one of the three Brian included:

“One of the voguish terms, which is so repellant to me, ‘thinking outside the box.’ To settle for that kind of language is embarrassing. But that’s a very useful picture. I try to come in through the side door, the side window, to come in from a direction they’re not expecting, to see something in a different way.”

Here’s the link to the interview on Psychology Today.